• August 2008 FEATURE ARTICLES •
Thought Leaders
If You Build It, Don’t Expect Them to Come
There’s a problem with imposing top-down HIEs on localized healthcare communities. They may not work.
By Robert E. Connely
One interesting problem with health
information exchanges (HIE), as we know them today, starts
with the implied promise in the name itself. There is little
to no focus on actual information exchange; rather, most
HIEs are about consolidating information and channeling
access to that information. Yet healthcare communities have
a real need for an efficient means of exchanging data.
Ask practitioners to describe their
primary operational challenges and the list will probably
include some reference to the transactional friction that
impedes the efficient exchange of information that is
essential to patient care, such as placing orders, obtaining
results and reports, and managing patient referrals.
Unfortunately, the vast majority of HIEs do little to ease
this friction.
It’s little wonder that many communities
are losing interest in grand, all-encompassing HIEs, which
are often funded by research grants. It is also becoming
clear that, despite an availability of technology and a
substantial investment in financial and human resources,
most HIEs have yet to produce a sustainable business value.
Continued failure to achieve this value could well relegate
HIEs to the dust bin of history, alongside the community
health information networks (CHINs) of the last decade.
Three failings illustrate why HIEs
generally have
not succeeded; and, with a change of focus, how this
can be rectified:
Starting too big: Many HIE
efforts start with the goal of sharing patient information
across the community — anywhere, anytime. This requires a
significant investment in technology, resources and time to
connect and integrate all of the participants in the
community before value can be realized, often requiring
participants to wait years before the HIE is usable.
Aggregating information also requires
complex manipulations, such as mapping patient identifiers,
standardizing clinical information and data types. Given the
current state of national standards, and commercial products
based on those standards, each HIE must build a system based
on proprietary standards today, and evolve to
standards-based systems if and when they become available.
In order for HIEs to be effective, it is
important to realize that starting with a big bang approach
or one that requires significant agreement across the
community should be avoided. Instead, an entrepreneurial
approach that looks to start small and grow from the
bottom-up has consistently proven to be the best way to
bring a new innovation to market.
Value proposition too low: One of
the most cited reasons for HIE failures is the inability to
achieve a sustainable business value. It is difficult to
escape the conclusion that if the HIE really served the
needs of the community, it would have earned the support of
the community it was meant to serve. Yet few HIEs are
designed to deliver the hard-dollar business value necessary
to justify the investments made in them.
Too often, the HIE is seen as an
"investment in the future," where everybody ultimately
benefits from its use. Unfortunately, we humans are not
inherently predisposed to do what’s best for us long-term
(e.g., eating right, exercising regularly and not smoking).
Instead, we tend to act selfishly to gain immediate
satisfaction or pain relief. Understanding this aspect of
human nature is what enables entrepreneurs to create
breakthrough innovations by looking for problems that cause
pain and creating the relief. If one applies this thinking
to an HIE, it becomes clear that the community would be
better served were the HIE to focus on more practical
things, such as reducing labor costs (pain) and improving
the efficiency of information exchange (satisfaction),
rather than preparing the community for the future.
By shifting the initial focus from
aggregating patient information to improving existing
workflows, HIEs could leverage labor reduction as the
business driver needed to financially support the HIE.
Interestingly, an HIE built to initially improve
transactional friction would virally grow into an HIE
capable of aggregating patient information at a much lower
cost than current approaches require.
The HIE market is artificial and
distorted by grant funding: One does not have to be
a free-market ideologue to see that HIE markets — initially
funded by substantial private, state and federal grants —
have distorted and even thwarted the normal, healthy market
dynamics that drive innovation, efficiency and value.
Specifically, artificial funding removes the need to
establish a toe hold in the market (what Geoffrey A. Moore
coined the "beachhead" in his book "Crossing the Chasm") and
reduces the market’s ability to react and kill off
unsuccessful ideas.
For example, grant funding has spurred a
kind of feeding frenzy among IT vendors who see the HIE as a
viable market for product purchases. This has led to a
situation where experts are defining the success criteria
for an HIE, effectively eliminating the natural selection
that normally empowers customers to determine what works and
what does not. Quickly killing off bad ideas before they
propagate is an essential element of market function; it
eliminates waste and ensures that only the best solutions
succeed.
As long as artificial funding remains a
core part of the equation, solutions that customers will not
buy will continue to be propagated, and innovators who, by
their very nature, perform best in early stage markets, will
not have a seat at
the HIE table.
These shortcomings underscore the
challenges facing communities as they build an HIE, and
point to a common-sense conclusion: Success depends not on
waiting for broad standards and choosing the anointed
technology, but rather, on identifying existing pain points,
using the HIE to deliver value by reducing the pain, then
expanding the system across the community in a natural,
incremental fashion. Until then, communities participating
in HIEs run the risk of being part of a doomed enterprise.
Robert E. Connely is president and CEO of
Novo Innovations, Alpharetta, Ga. Contact him at
robert.connely@novoinnovations.com or 770-641-9063.